sun 24/11/2024

Luna Gale, Hampstead Theatre | reviews, news & interviews

Luna Gale, Hampstead Theatre

Luna Gale, Hampstead Theatre

Topical and thought-provoking child neglect play is hampered by sensational twists

Family matters: Sharon Small's social worker assesses parents Karlie (Rachel Redford) and Peter (Alexander Arnold)Manuel Harlan

Can we really distinguish between experience-based judgement and personal bias? Caroline, the social worker at the centre of American writer Rebecca Gilman’s latest "issue" play, trusts a gut instinct informed by her 25-year career, but those decisions – which shape the lives of her young charges and their families – are gradually revealed to be subjective in the extreme.

The passion that fuels her commitment to an arduous, under-appreciated job is also the reason she might not be suitable to perform it.

It’s a refreshing subversion of the traditional "caring people versus intractable system" narrative. The bureaucracy of the Iowa Department of Human Services is unwieldy, but navigable – and vulnerable to manipulation. When Caroline (Sharon Small, pictured below with Corey Johnson and Caroline Faber) meets meth-smoking teenagers Karlie (Rachel Redford) and Peter (Alexander Arnold), who brought severely dehydrated infant daughter Luna to the emergency room, it’s an initially easy decision to remove her from unfit parents and place her with grandmother Cindy (Faber). But Cindy, who decides to seek permanent custody, is an evangelical Christian, in thrall to her pastor (Johnson) and proclaiming the end of days; Karlie is desperate to save Luna from the environment she escaped. When Carolines involvement with the case becomes deeply personal, she decides to rig the system.

Luna Gale, Hampstead TheatreHer decision is played as a gasp-inducing cliffhanger, a melodramatic twist that disrupts Gilman’s socially conscious naturalism. This and several subsequent soap operatic beats are retroactively tempered or explained, but it doesn’t stop them feeling out of character and tonally jarring in the moment. The starkly schematic, suspense-driven plotting distances us from the emotive subject matter, while also limiting the possibilities for both challenging, nuanced debate and richly metaphorical theatre. A signposted subplot adds to the overload.

Yet there are smart, topical observations about the devastating effects of slashing welfare budgets: Karlie’s recovery is hampered by long rehab waiting lists, and the alternative, wittily named support group "Mothers Off Meth" AKA "MOM", offers nothing but craft nights. Officious, state-appointed boss Cliff (Ed Hughes) has a beady eye on cost-cutting, and, following numerous redundancies, even devoted Caroline longs for early retirement to escape an avalanche of cases – although, with just two mentioned in the play, the latter point is only really illustrated by Lucy Osborne’s striking set, framed by towering shelves of box files.

Michael Attenborough, returning to the venue he ran in the late 1980s, draws engaging performances, albeit with wandering accents. Smalls compelling workaholic is both benevolent and crippled by her own damage, Faber and Johnson bring sincerity to potential caricatures, and Arnold’s Peter grapples believably with the complexities of adulthood. In a world full of people defined by past abuse, seeking miracle cures through faith, drugs or redemptive work, his growth is laudable, even as we face the fact that the systems designed to help emphatically failed him. It's a thought-provoking discussion of parental, individual and public responsibility, but too bluntly didactic to truly move.

The starkly schematic, suspense-driven plotting distances us from emotive subject matter

rating

Editor Rating: 
3
Average: 3 (1 vote)

Share this article

Add comment

The future of Arts Journalism

 

You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!

We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d

And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters