wed 25/12/2024

Best of Enemies, Noel Coward Theatre review - opposites attract, sort of | reviews, news & interviews

Best of Enemies, Noel Coward Theatre review - opposites attract, sort of

Best of Enemies, Noel Coward Theatre review - opposites attract, sort of

James Graham play hits the West End on the way, presumably, to Broadway

Mind your back: David Harewood and Zachary Quinto in 'Best of Enemies' Johan Persson

Opposition (and history) are the apparent mainstays of the ceaselessly busy James Graham, and he conjoins the two to riveting effect in Best of Enemies.

Telling of the televised 1968 debates between William F Buckley and Gore Vidal during that year's presidential race, Graham's hurtling drama is now in the West End after its Young Vic debut nearly a year ago; Broadway, presumably, is the next destination, not least given his play's American setting. 

We've been down this road before in varying ways, via Frost/Nixon on the one hand and Graham's own Ink, which posited two male adversaries (one of them a young Rupert Murdoch), just as this play does.

But more than either of these forebears, Best of Enemies sets its central face-off against the whirligig of history, which includes random-seeming appearances from the Anglo-Pakistani playwright and commentator Tariq Ali and the American media analyst Brooke Gladstone to contextualise what happened then for those watching now.David Harewood (right) as William F Buckley in 'Best of Enemies'In fact, Graham's writing is pointed enough that you can trace, without assistance, a direct line between the collapse in civility that bookends his account of the televised goings-on and the thoroughgoing surrender to vitriol, and worse, that shapes public discourse just now. You can't imagine either Buckley or Vidal shouting "lock 'er up", even if comparable sentiments were clearly brewing not far from the surface, as Buckley's uncharacteristic surrender to ad hominem invective makes clear. 

I was transfixed by this play 11 months ago in its smaller, cosier Off West End setting, as I was again the other night, notwithstanding a disconcerting broadness to some of the supporting performances and a level of amplification new to me in a non-musical: perhaps the director Jeremy Herrin's recent experience on Broadway directing the musical Almost Famous, or Graham's on the Almeida's terrific Tammy Faye (which he scripted), has played its part here. Whatever the reason, the play is now so amply mic'd that I wouldn't be surprised if theatregoers in Manhattan weren't hearing every line on St Martin's Lane. (That's one way to save on transfer costs.) 

Luckily, the volume is always at the service of words worth hearing and in the mouths, largely, of two central characters who are seen as three-dimensionally as one would expect. Graham, after all, is by now a dab hand at seeing men (and, in Tammy Faye, a womanof influence in the round. It would be easy to take potshots at the echt-conservative Buckley, and his National Review house organ founded in 1955, but Harewood's brilliant occupancy of the part (pictured above right) foregrounds an eloquence that belongs to a bygone age and that, once it slips, leaves real grief in its wake.

The casting of a Black actor in this of all roles pretty well demands that we look at Buckley afresh, free of whatever prejudices audiences anywhere on the socio-political spectrum may bring to bear. Buckley himself might have something to say on this topic, but that awareness only attunes us further to Harewood's robust empathy for a man whose love of language is well-matched to that of Vidal. 

Quinto has taken over as Vidal from Olivier Award nominee Charles Edwards, which means that this American Europhile is now being played by an actual American, making his West End debut. (Interestingly, Quinto's erstwhile Broadway castmate in The Boys in the Band, Andrew Rannells, has been making his London debut across town in Tammy Faye.) Darker-featured and more camp than Edwards, Quinto cuts a considerably more saturnine and sneering presence, which I suspect is also closer to the Vidal who comes springing off the pages of Martin Amis's The Moronic Inferno, not to mention the vaunted playwright and author's own bitingly peppery work. Quinto's somewhat crueller Vidal makes up in quicksilver wit what has gone missing in charm. 

Emilio Doorgasingh in 'Best of Enemies' as Howard AustenAs America seemed to crumble at the seams – nothing new there – the two intellects matched wits in a televisual set-to that was intended to boost ratings for ABC and that here finds Andy Warhol and James Baldwin (Syrus Lowe, repeating his excellent performance) popping in to ramp up the celebrity wattage. Bunny Christie's set pays imposing homage to the prominence of TV, a medium that at the time didn't have the disproportionate power it has achieved in the decades since to shape, or misshape, our lives: to that end, Best of Enemies would make an apt repertory companion to Ink, which itself looks forward to Fox News much as this play inevitably anticipates Trump. 

An American supporting cast will in time be more comfortable with the likes of Richard Daley, the long-serving Chicago mayor, or Howard Austen, the longtime companion of Vidal, the latter here played by Emilio Doorgasingh (pictured above) channelling Harvey Fierstein, of all unlikely people. But when the play's adversarial principals go head-to-head, you feel the play at full throttle and succumb to a rhetorical display that resonates fully amidst the far-from-best of times we inhabit just now.

Zachary Quinto has taken over from Olivier Award nominee Charles Edwards, which means that an American Europhile, Gore Vidal, is now being played by an actual American

rating

Editor Rating: 
4
Average: 4 (1 vote)

Share this article

Add comment

The future of Arts Journalism

 

You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!

We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d

And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters