Founder rate ends 9th September.

We’re rebuilding theartsdesk to secure the future of real arts journalism. Be part of it by subscribing: if you do it now, the founders’ rate of just £40 yearly is yours FOR LIFE!

SUBSCRIBE NOW 

Punk Rock, Lyric Hammersmith

Simon Stephens' latest play is a powerful portrayal of nihilistic violence in school

share this article

Is youth wasted on the young? Well, precious few grown-ups who watch Simon Stephens's new drama, Punk Rock, will develop a sudden urge to be a teenager again: his portrait of a group of middle-class youngsters is every parent's nightmare. They are either foul-mouthed and aggressive bullies, or deeply troubled neurotics - and the gradual escalation of their conflicts ends in the kind of mindless violence that stays on the front pages for days.

Set in a Stockport grammar school, on the eve of A-level exams, the play starts off with the tender encounter between two 17-year-olds, local fantasist William and newcomer Lily, who has just arrived from Cambridge (where her father was a don). He asks her out; she says no. When he finds out that she's going out with another boy, the athletic Nicholas, the temperature rises. Meanwhile, another boy, the arrogant bully Bennett, is tormenting both the school swot, Chadwick, and another girl, Tanya. Very slowly, the tensions rise and boil over.

There is a nihilistic undercurrent which pulses like black bile just below the surface

It has to be said that Stephens is less interested in the state of British schools than in the clash of individuals within an isolated group. Despite their comfortable backgrounds, his teenagers are a tight fistful of fears, from the dread of failing exams to discontent with body image, and from the acute anxieties over sexuality to self-harm and homicidal rage. As such, they symbolize the fears of parents, and present a snapshot of a Britain beset with dread.

At one point, when William discovers that Lily burns herself with a cigarette lighter, a rare moment of empathy and hope radiates from the stage. More typical moments, however, are those scenes in which Bennett exults in humiliating his classmates, and the provocative episode which ends with him spitting at Tanya draws gasps of outrage. Whether these kids are mocking the local chavs, or dreaming of escape from Stockport's claustrophobic confines, there is a nihilistic undercurrent which pulses like black bile just below the surface.

And although Chadwick's apocalyptic vision of a future Britain ripped apart by social breakdown is balanced by an optimistic speech from Lily, which concludes that 99 per cent of young people are alright, the disturbing violence of the play's ending is shocking enough to stay with you long after you leave the theatre.

Yes, this is a play that will split audiences. Older spectators might seriously question whether it is right to show such nihilistic violence without providing a rational reason for it. In fact, Stephens expressly rejects any explanation for the events he puts on stage. For younger audiences, this seems to be less of a problem, and they are bound to recognize these characters and the uncertainty, rawness and fierceness of their emotion.

The youthfulness of the story is enhanced by the youth of the actors, several of which are making their professional debuts. Tom Sturridge's naïve William, Jessica Raine's mixed-up but passionate Lilly, Henry Lloyd-Hughes's vicious Bennett and Henry McEntire's brainy Chadwick are well supported by Katie West's Tanya, Nicholas Banks's Nicholas and Sophie Wu as Bennett's girlfriend Cissy. The callowness and vulnerability of the cast add a gauche sensibility to Sarah Frankcom's thrilling, if uneven, production which, for all its imperfections, bears its youthfulness like a badge of pride.

Punctuated by blasts of rock music from the likes of Sonic Youth, the Stooges and the White Stripes, Punk Rock conveys a wild sense of the hormonal confusions, anarchic fantasy and psychological precariousness of British teenagers today. For all the awkwardness of the acting, this is a play that sticks your fingers into an electric socket, and holds them there. If you're young, it will speak directly to you, if you're not, it will make you glad of the fact.

The disturbing violence of the play's ending is shocking enough to stay with you long after you leave the theatre

rating

0

explore topics

share this article

Help secure the future of arts journalism

In this era of algorithmic recommendation, opaquely sponsored content and AI slop, theartsdesk’s mission to preserve real journalistic and critical values has never been more important.

If you like what you see here, please join us 
in this mission.

Subscribing to the site will help us in our coming 
redesign and expansion.


If you do this before the 9th September this will be at our guaranteed founder’s rate: 
your subs will never increase again.

Subscribe now for £5 per month. 
or yearly for just £40.

Or if you simply want to support us with a one-off donation, you can do so here.

more theatre

Phelim McDermott, with his magic piano, pays tribute to his friend Philip Glass
Magnificent cast bring fresh energy to show approaching 50 years of age
Disappointingly literal version of Sarah Kane’s classic account of love tested to extremes
Emily White’s new play is important, but too often tells where it could show
New play about love and loneliness in London has terrific gender and genre fluidity
Not everything works but, with this unbreakable musical, it doesn't need to
Simon Stone's latest reversioning of a classic is a muddled misfire
Lots of innovative ideas, but we need to hear the line readings clearly
Eurovision star Sam Ryder is made for the title role, while Drew McOnie’s choreography makes us feel the delirium
Chloë Moss’s new drama is a nerve-fraying example of telephonic tension