sat 18/05/2024

BBC Proms: Ma, BBCSO, Robertson | reviews, news & interviews

BBC Proms: Ma, BBCSO, Robertson

BBC Proms: Ma, BBCSO, Robertson

A performance of Beethoven's Ninth more tragic than triumphant

Over the past six weeks of the Proms the BBC’s hard-working Symphony Orchestra has performed everything from Britten to Brahms, Verdi to Volans. Their Mahler with Ed Gardner was an operatic epic, their programme of English music for Mark Wigglesworth glowed with wit. Yet hearing their ragged and unlovely account of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony last night it was hard to remember their triumphs, hard even to remember the delicate account of Graham Fitkin’s new Cello Concerto that they delivered in the first half, so complete was their collapse.

Conceived as a programme of boundary-breaking works, Beethoven’s iconoclastic Ninth was paired with the world premiere of Fitkin’s concerto. Rejecting conventional virtuosity for a more exploratory dialogue between soloist and orchestra, the concerto also eschews movement divisions in a favour of a single, episodic structure.

 

Written with last night’s soloist Yo-Yo Ma in mind, Fitkin’s work develops like a series of textural variations, showcasing Ma’s range of tone colours and testing their relationship with different orchestral shades. The long, held notes that dominate the opening solo line are marked “warm”, “colder”, undermining the supremacy of pitch and placing the focus instead on quality of sound.

It’s an approach that demands a different listening process. The unfolding cantilena of the solo line stresses the melodic, the horizontal, but against the stillness of the cello it is the vertical harmonic arrival points, the junctions at which glassy cello harmonics encounter high wind cluster chords that draw the ear, forcing it to reinterpret the unchanging solo cello as contexts shift around it.

Yet among all this minimalist restraint and abstraction, some hints of Fitkin’s humour and humanity still remain. The first theme in the cello is bittersweet and folky, unmistakably English in character, while the central plucked section is a syncopated rhythmic scrum of a scherzo – a fight Ma gamely flung himself into, the filmy gestures of the opening long forgotten. If this sweet-tempered musical meditation is an anti-concerto, then its rebellion approaches with a smile and a minimalist hint of a wink.

dd-David Roberts 0501025188The spectacle and scope of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony feels like a perfect fit for the Proms, yet the tricky Royal Albert Hall acoustic doesn’t necessarily seem to agree. It takes a special orchestra indeed to project the force needed by the opening Allegro if it is not to sound like a toy drum on a battlefield. Dynamics need to be recalibrated – fortes louder, pianos softer – if the contrasts are to survive the journey out into the arena. Here detail became lost in a non-committal wash of mezzo-forte, balance issues drowning certain themes while giving absurd prominence to accompanying motifs.

While David Robertson (pictured right), the BBCSO’s principal guest conductor, seemed to be giving a rather neat, incisive interpretation, the orchestra seemed either unwilling or incapable of following, catching his energy for a few bars before slipping back into confusion and torpor. Given that offstage bands can coordinate with the stage from up in the gallery there seems little excuse for the brass and string sections who perpetually bumped heads during transitional passages, with the music audibly rattling over the points each time they came together. Fourth horn and First Oboe (to a greater and lesser degree) were having off-nights, and by the time we reached the final movement the orchestra might as well have been in the pub in body as well as mind.

The arrival of the soloists and chorus (a team effort from the BBC Symphony and Philharmonia Choruses) prompted everyone to rally slightly, and it was the singers’ well-drilled impetus that carried us across the finish line. Iain Paterson’s pleading “O Freunde” (can the lines, “O friends, no more of these sounds! Let us rather sing something pleasant and full of joy” ever have been more aptly applied?) rang out with all the urgency the orchestra had lacked, and Toby Spence and Karen Cargill also gave life to Schiller’s joy, leaving only Christine Brewer an uncharacteristically shrill musical naysayer.

Perhaps the unfamiliar Fitkin absorbed too much rehearsal time, perhaps the orchestra were tired in this, their 10th Prom of the year – whatever the reason, this was perhaps the biggest musical disappointment of the season. I only hope that among the sold-out hall there weren’t too many for whom this was a first-time experience, a one-off experiment with classical music. In their shoes, I wouldn’t be coming back.

Comments

Spot on Alexandra, from the front right Arena anyway! I've seen various reviews and message board comments and none have mentioned Roberston's brave, if foolhardy, attempt to inject Historically Informed practices (!) and sound into the Beethoven.

And from the back centre Arena. I had the feeling that the entire brass section were performing through some sort of an invisible accoustic curtain. A friend suggested that this interpretation was contrived to make one feel empathy with the composer's hearing disability.

I was listening on my computer and after a while I decided to check if my speakers were working properly. It was definitely the worst performance of the ninth I think I have ever heard.As for the excuses about the Hall being difficult for the ninth. Baloney. I heard a performance of this some years back (I dont remember year or orchestra) which completely tooky my breath away.I do recall that, back in the those days, the prom concerts were much shorter with only the ninth on the programme. I do not understand the coupling of the new piece with the Beethoven. There is no point in trying to do the ninth as a sort of encore. It deserves much more attention than that, and if it´s not given, the symphony is sure to bite back, as it did with a vengeance last night. Did they rehearse it at ALL?

Add comment

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters