wed 04/12/2024

Grand Prix: The Killer Years, BBC Four | reviews, news & interviews

Grand Prix: The Killer Years, BBC Four

Grand Prix: The Killer Years, BBC Four

Shocking survey of the bloodstained history of Grand Prix racing

Sebastian Vettel, Red Bull's boy wonder, wins in Australia

Following yesterday's season-opening Australian Grand Prix, McLaren's team boss Martin Whitmarsh was extremely unhappy that his driver Jenson Button had been given a drive-through penalty. Button had overtaken a Ferrari by cutting a corner, and should have yielded the position back, but McLaren requested guidance from the race controllers. Instead, all they got was a punishment from the stewards which retarded Button's progress by 23 seconds.

"I feel a bit harshly treated," moaned Whitmarsh.

Increasingly, this sort of technical quibbling is what passes for "action" in Formula 1, but back in 1968, as Grand Prix: The Killer Years revealed, F1 had more pressing issues on its mind. Grand Prix racing had always been dangerous, but this was the year when the bleak drumbeat of racing fatalities reached a hideous crescendo. The death of Jim Clark at Hockenheim had the most traumatic impact, since he was one of the greatest drivers of that or any era, but 1968 also brought the demise of Mike Spence, Lodovico Scarfiotti and Jo Schlesser. The latter perished in especially gruesome fashion when the experimental Honda he was driving caught fire. The bodywork was made of magnesium, which burns with flare-like intensity.

Whether this parade of horrors was an entirely apt way to celebrate the new F1 season is a moot point, but The Killer Years had marshalled an impressive selection of interviews plus archive and newsreel film that rammed home its point with devastating force. Among many other incidents, we heard the story of how when Lorenzo Bandini crashed in flames at Monaco the other drivers could smell burning flesh as they passed. Jochen Rindt (whose widow, Nina, contributed a beautifully poised and touching interview) might not have died at Monza if he'd fastened his harness properly and if the track staff had screwed the Armco barriers together properly. The most shocking sequence of all was film of David Purley trying to rescue fellow driver Roger Williamson from his blazing wreck at Zandvoort in 1973, while the race continued around him and track officials did nothing to help (Jim Clark, pictured below).

jim_clark_trimThe film reminded us that drivers' protests about the horrific rate of attrition in their sport were often ignored or even ridiculed by the racing press, who took the view that real men would grit their teeth and get on with it. As Jackie Stewart put it, incredulously, "We were not at war." Race-track owners took the more prosaic view that upgrading safety facilities would cost money that they didn't want to spend. In those days, at a circuit like Spa in Belgium, there was only the occasional straw bale between the hurtling cars and the buildings, ditches, walls and trees that adjoined the circuit. It took a drivers' revolt, led by Stewart, to start the process which eventually led to today's luxuriously appointed circuits, with their vast run-off areas, various kinds of energy-absorbing barriers and instant-reaction medical and emergency services. On top of that, today's cars are immeasurably safer and more crash-proof.

All of which makes it virtually impossible to compare the mindset of a contemporary F1 driver and one who raced 50 years ago. In the bad old days, a driver had a sort of fighter pilot's mentality and had to reckon that he'd probably be killed - Stewart estimated that he had a two-in-three chance of dying - whereas today, he'll almost certainly survive. So we should be grateful that yesterday Jenson Button suffered nothing worse than a slight delay. Just don't expect F1 in 2011 to deliver the terrifying drama and lunatic heroism that pours off those old newsreel films of the F1 of yesteryear.

The drivers' protests were ridiculed by the racing press, who took the view that real men would grit their teeth and get on with it

Share this article

Comments

As an avid fan of modern Formula 1, I will beg to differ with Adam's comments about it being dull- I am simply in awe of the skill and commitment of the likes of Hamilton and Vettel, and I find the politics and off-track manouverings fascinating as well. As to this programme, it was a gruelling watch indeed. The film of Bandini's body being carried from the charred remains of his car at Monza were horrific, and David Purley's vain attempts to rescue Roger Wlliamson while track officials did nothing and other drivers raced on past the burning wreckage brought tears to my eyes. How far we have come, thanks mainly to the efforts of Jackie Stewart, that a driver can have a huge accident such as Mark Webber's in Valencia last year, and walk away with barely a scratch. But Formula 1 will always be dangerous, and sooner or later I fear another driver will die. There was an air of complacency around the sport before Imola 1994, and while there is no doubt that car and circuit design has removed much of the risk, travelling at 200mph in close proximity can never be a safe activity. That is why I find the courage and ability of today's drivers as remarkable as those of 40 years ago.

Matt SR - I agree that F1 has a remarkable bunch of young drivers (Hamilton and Vettel as you say, also Alonso, Rosberg and Kubica when he's fit), but there's got to be something wrong when they have to keep changing the rules to make the racing more interesting. The politics is often the most exciting part of the whole circus. PS - I see you're a Schubert fan as well. Interesting combination!

Add comment

The future of Arts Journalism

 

You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!

We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d

And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters