sun 29/12/2024

Tannhäuser, Royal Opera | reviews, news & interviews

Tannhäuser, Royal Opera

Tannhäuser, Royal Opera

Superior cast elevates revival of Albery’s serviceable production

Peter Seiffert as TannhäuserAll images by Clive Barda © ROH

Tim Albery’s 2010 production of Wagner's Tannhäuser is back for a revival at Royal Opera, featuring a different conductor and a nearly new cast, with one notable exception. The production itself is serviceable, visually coherent and with plenty of atmosphere. The sets, by Michael Levine begin with a replica of the Covent Garden proscenium arch in the Venusberg scene, which is then shown in progressive states of decay in the following acts.

The Venusberg choreography, by Jasmin Vardimon, is modern and slick, as dynamic as it is sensual.

The drama that follows is much more static, however, with brief moments of illuminating Personenregie, particularly in the song contest. Costumes, by Jon Morrell, are a mix of new and old, mostly in drab colours, with the crowd in the song contest incongruously dressed as Kalashnikov-toting guerrillas. Disparate ideas, but they all fit together, in a production that for this revival proves a good vehicle for a close to ideal cast in the major roles.

Tempos are generally fast and phrasing is clipped and precise

Conductor Hartmut Haenchen can’t match the effortless breadth and fluency that Semyon Bychkov brought to the production on its first run – who could? But nor does he try: Haenchen’s approach is slicker, less opulent but more dynamic. Tempos are generally fast – the performance ended 20 minutes earlier than advertised – and phrasing is clipped and precise. Some of the more lyrical passages loose out under Haenchen’s baton, particularly the Pilgrim’s Chorus, which never fully blooms. But Haenchen has a good sense for the progression through Wagner's music, always elegantly shaping the drama. Sometimes he leaves the singers behind, though: his fast pace in the Act II “Landgraf Hermann, Heil!” almost lost the chorus, and Hermann himself (Stephen Milling) lagged behind in the following narration. First night woes only, one hopes.

The 2010 cast was impressive (Johan Botha, Eva-Maria Westbroek, Michaela Schuster), but the singers assembled for this revival are even more so, particularly for their suitability to their respective roles. Sophie Koch is an alluring Venus, with a rich, silky tone. Her diction is poor though, with barely a word audible. Peter Seiffert is a fine Tannhäuser, with a powerful, commanding tone and richly expressive delivery. He had some problems with the louder passages on the first night, particularly in the Rome narrative, where his voice often broke off on high-phrase endings. But in the quieter music, particularly in the second act, his characterisation was excellent, Tannhäuser's increasing sense of guilt and remorse powerfully portrayed through Seiffert’s increasingly anguished utterances. Emma Bell has a suitably pure tone for Elisabeth: her voice is a little narrow in the louder music, but it is just about big enough for the role, and she too acts as convincingly as she sings. Stephen Milling’s Herrmann was the best of the supporting roles, his tone smooth, even and well projected.But best of all was Christian Gerhaher as Wolfram (pictured above). It’s his signature role, which he first sang at the Royal Opera in 2010, and Covent Garden is one of the many houses around the world where it is now almost impossible to imagine anybody else singing it. Gerhaher is first and foremost a recitalist, and he has previously performed Wolfram in that spirit, coming on, singing and then leaving again. But there is more characterisation in his performance now, more interaction, with Elisabeth in Act II and with Tannhäuser in Act III. Vocally, he is as fine as ever, with a distinctive timbre that can effortlessly carry across any texture, the colour simultaneously warm and complex. Last time round he completely stole the show. This time he’s in a stronger cast, but he’s still the main draw.

@saquabote

Haenchen has a good sense for the progression through the music, always elegantly shaping the drama

rating

Editor Rating: 
3
Average: 3 (1 vote)

Share this article

Comments

Interesting review - Peter Steiffert's voice was completely failing him in the final scene and it made for terribly uncomfortable viewing. Strange that the reviewer didn't pick up on that.

Gerhaher gave a great performance, but everything else was second rate - the first act had no production to speak of - the rest dull; Koch. lovely singer miscast, Bell's voice is now a bit too blowsy and big for this role - (Sieglinde would suit?), and as for Seiffert, once he was an excellent Tannhauser, but at 62 his voice cannot hold up in any way to the demands of this role. The consensus in our row was that it was unlikely that he could see out the whole run.

Was I at a different performance to the reviewer?

Seiffert was THE Tannhäuser when he came to London with Zurich Opera for a concert performance (how long ago now?) Impressive for a Heldentenor to have reached 62 and still be singing but I'm not surprised by those who say this role is now a stretch too far.

As well as the unreliability of the voice Seiffert was having real trouble moving around the stage. Without the conveniently positioned chair he wouldn't have got through the Minnesang scene. I found him totally unconvincing, I'm afraid. Koch, Gerhaher and Bell were outstanding.

It was a great shame - I saw Seiffert as Siegmund in Berlin only a little over two years ago and he gave a stunning performance. But alas, his voice on Tuesday did seem dangerously frayed and hoarse. To an extent, I allowed myself to accept the vocal flaws in the last act as not entirely out of place for a broken man, but he was clearly struggling here. But both Gerhaher and Bell was stunning, I thought.

Add comment

The future of Arts Journalism

 

You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!

We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d

And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters