sat 21/12/2024

Tamerlano, Il Pomo d'Oro, Emelyanychev, Barbican | reviews, news & interviews

Tamerlano, Il Pomo d'Oro, Emelyanychev, Barbican

Tamerlano, Il Pomo d'Oro, Emelyanychev, Barbican

An inexcusably poor evening of music from a superb ensemble

Julia Lezhneva: the young soprano was the evening's biggest disappointment

The curse of Tamerlano strikes again. The last time London saw Handel’s darkest and most sober opera was in 2010. Graham Vick’s production for the Royal Opera House lost its unlikely star Placido Domingo before it even opened in London, ran interminably long and lost any emotional impetus somewhere in the course of its three-and-a-half hours.

To say, then, that last night’s concert performance from Maxim Emelyanychev and Il Pomo d’Oro made an even poorer job of the piece is not to dismiss it lightly.

The Barbican have fine form where baroque opera is concerned. We’ve become used to concert performances that are in fact semi-stagings – with the emphasis more or less on the “semi” – with props, basic sets and off-copy singers delivering fully dramatised performances. What we got last night was the laziest of concerts.

Singers came and went seemingly at will, frequently absent when still implicated in the dialogue of others, making a mockery of any attempts at visual drama. And even when they were present, each was wedded to his or her music stand. None of this need have mattered had conductor Maxim Emelyanychev (pictured above) supplemented the lack of staging with vivid musical narrative. As it was, between recitatives that bagged and sagged under their own ponderous weight and senseless pauses for applause (even from Emelyanychev himself) and bows from the singers after every single aria, shattering Handel’s already fragmented drama, we were trapped in a second-rate concert that just refused to end.

Then there was the casting. John Mark Ainsley is a peerlessly musical and sensitive singer, but an unlikely fit for the warrior-king Bajazet, tiptoeing where he needed to thunder. He was given little help by Emelyanychev, who, showing no sympathy for a lighter voice, encouraged the band with gestures more suited to Verdi than Handel, crushing Ainsley underfoot.

Julia Lezhneva was the evening’s biggest disappointment, however. This young soprano’s voice has changed out of all recognition since she first sang at the Barbican only a handful of years ago, developing some terrible technical habits that have stunted its growth, and robbed it of all its natural freedom and certainty of intonation. With no bloom or spin on the sound, Lezhneva can only strike a note and hold it briefly, piano-like, leaving her cruelly exposed in slow arias, which tend flat and gripped, though she still just about gets away with the coloratura. Her Asteria, far from Handel’s assertive heroine, was timid and tight throughout, barely registering the presence of love-interest Andronico (Max Emmanuel Cencic).

Cencic, together with fellow countertenor Xavier Sabata (pictured left), was the most vocally secure presence on stage, though determined to break any illusion of character by air-conducting his way through his every aria and losing a fair amount of language in his hazy diction. Musically, though, his Andronico was a worthy rival to Sabata’s Tamerlano, making this rocky bromance an unusually fair fight. Sabata is an endlessly watchable performer – relaxed and comfortable, though perhaps lacking the ferocity this psychopath needs to sustain well over three hours of cruelty and scheming.

Il Pomo d’Oro themselves had all the sparkle we usually hear under director Riccardo Minasi, with beautiful solo moments for bassoon, flute and recorder adding colour to propulsive strings. Even their brilliance, however, could not raise this limp performance within a mile of the group’s stellar recording from 2014. Plead poor cast substitutions (swapping Karina Gauvin for Lezhneva was never going to be a fair swap) and, in the case of Ainsley, the difference between casting for studio and concert hall, but whichever way you spin it this was still a spectacularly poor performance, and one that failed to grasp the mature complexity and angular beauty of Handel’s opera.

Musically, Cencic's Andronico was a worthy rival to Sabata’s Tamerlano, making this rocky bromance an unusually fair fight

rating

Editor Rating: 
2
Average: 2 (1 vote)

Share this article

Comments

We seem to have been listening to different concerts. For me - and for most of the audience, to judge from their response - Lezhneva was the star of the show, and her father/daughter pairing with Ainsley its emotional heart. I agree, however, about the arbitrary coming and going of the artists, especially Cencic and Xabata.

Well, I was at the same concert as Alexandra Coghlan and entirely agree with her assessment of Lezhneva. Expressionless, unemotional, unengaged, she didn't seem to be aware that the concert was a collaborative event. Her intonation was shaky, and it was difficult to tell she was singing in Italian, even from where I was near the front of the Stalls.

Review spot on, unfortunately. Interminable performance with no drama or organisation, and some extraordinary noises from Lezhneva (although as reported some good coloratura - what's going on?). Even the good singers didn't raise excitement or connect, and the pattern - turgidly delivered recitative, aria and applause every time (even when the performer had just wandered off) limited the effect of the brief moments of enjoyment, of which I admit there were several. Maybe the second half was better, I didn't wait to find out.

It was and you should have bothered to stick around.

Add comment

The future of Arts Journalism

 

You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!

We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d

And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters