The Merry Widow, English National Opera review - glitter but no sparkle | reviews, news & interviews
The Merry Widow, English National Opera review - glitter but no sparkle
The Merry Widow, English National Opera review - glitter but no sparkle
It's hard to know whether to mourn or celebrate this uneven production
It’s all there. High kicks and tight corsets; silk and sequins and shenanigans in a broom closet; hot pinks and still hotter can-can girls; waltzing, scheming, sparring, and a bit with a banquet table. There’s even a dancing beaver. So why don’t I feel more elated?
English National Opera’s new Merry Widow can’t be faulted for effort. But in comedy, as in seduction or sales, trying too hard can be almost as destructive as not trying at all. Gripping Lehar’s crystal champagne flute of an operetta in a hot fist only leads to spillage and a swift loss of bubbles.Everyone’s had a go at the Widow. Tom Stoppard has done it, Kit Hesketh-Harvey, Simon Butteriss, Jeremy Sams’ translation is the only redeeming feature of the current Met production, which is perhaps how the unlikely double-act of April de Angelis and Richard Thomas ended up with the gig. Thomas brings all the subtlety of Jerry Springer the Opera to lyrics that rarely rise above the moon/June level of invention, and the usually brilliant de Angelis fares only a little better with the book which only tinkers around the edges of the plot. Did they ever meet? There’s no evidence of it in the sudden lurches in tone that regularly send the drama sprawling from Edwardian pantomime to locker-room innuendo. And what's with all the Americanisms?
Much has been made in previews of the production’s up-to-date attitude and its feminism. But apparently when they said feminism what they meant was that the can-can dancers wear Doc Martens along with their skimpies. Interestingly the most progressive moment of the original – where the “respectable wife” Valencienne kicks off her marital respectability and joins the Chez Maxim grisettes – gets re-assigned to Hanna here, missing the point rather spectacularly (but showing off the impressive dancing skills of leading lady Sarah Tynan, pictured below).There are some good moments. Hanna’s first entrance, styled with more than a nod to Monroe’s “Diamonds Are a Girl’s Best Friend” from Gentlemen Prefer Blondes points up the plot’s neatly gender-reversed take on fortune-hunting, and relocating the men’s ensemble to a urinal (complete with, er, free-flowing choreography) makes a cheeky riposte to Calixto Bieito’s infamous ENO Un Ballo in Maschera. A Valencienne in thrall to therapy’s psycho-babble makes for some nice lines, but what a shame her tryst with Camille takes place in a broom-cupboard whose hinged door ensures a good third of the auditorium can’t see what’s going on inside. Far better is director Max Webster's canny substitution of Act II’s awkward gazebo for a pair of banquet tables whose quakes and trembles reveal the amorous couple concealed beneath.The music is a similarly mixed bag. Lehar’s diaphanous melodies and deft scoring should be lighter than a promise made after midnight, and every bit as evanescent. Here, however, conductor Kristiina Poska gives us the shouted declarations of an earnest teenager with a boombox on his shoulder. There’s too much pah and not nearly enough oom to an account plagued by balance issues (not helped by dodgy amplification that comes and goes unreliably between dialogue and song) and too often obliterates the stage.A cast of ENO regulars give it their all. Andrew Shore does what he does best as the wheezing cuckold Baron Zeta, and Robert Murray and Rhian Lois are a fabulous Camille and Valencienne (pictured above). Veteran Nathan Gunn ambles and shambles his way genially through as playboy Danilo, though there’s a bit of a void where the central chemistry should be. Tynan likewise delivers an absolutely efficient performance, doing everything that is asked of her (and everything is) and more, but never quite holding either stage or score in her hand as a true Hanna should.
Energy and a very obvious desire to please carries this production home – just. It looks great, and relaxation and familiarity will solve a lot of the problems, though the essential conflict between a desire to shock and a desperate fear of actually succeeding will remain. If you like your widows brassy and sturdily shod, more Real Housewives of Pontevedro than gilded Parisian ballroom, then this one’s for you.
Add comment
The future of Arts Journalism
You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!
We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d
And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.
Subscribe to theartsdesk.com
Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.
To take a subscription now simply click here.
And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?
Comments
This review is misleading.
Not misleading, just a