thu 19/12/2024

RoboCop | reviews, news & interviews

RoboCop

RoboCop

José Padilha's reboot boasts stars and a slick finish but lacks substance

Another day, another remake. 'RoboCop' gets the 12A treatment.

José Padilha’s glossy reimagining of RoboCop is entertaining but mostly forgettable. Geared towards the profitable 12A market, its good looking but illogical action sequences are no replacement for the grimy, grubby and magnificently realised dystopian world from Paul Verhoeven’s 1987 scathing satire.

Just like Verhoeven did back in the 1980s, Padilha is making his way into the Hollywood arena thanks to his adept hand at fast paced action sequences, which can be witnessed in his superb Elite Squad films. Unlike in Verhoeven’s version however, the screenplay penned by newcomer Joshua Zetumer isn’t quite up to scratch, lacking in humour and sharp satire.

Joel Kinnaman (pictured below right with Gary Oldman) stars as law enforcer Alex Murphy, who is transformed into RoboCop after a horrific accident. Abbie Cornish is his distraught wife Clara who agrees to this risky procedure, putting his life into the hands of OmniCorp CEO Raymond Sellars (Michael Keaton) and scientist Dr. Norton (Gary Oldman). Sellars is intent on marketing and selling a law enforcement droid with emotional intelligence (and a human face) to US citizens so seizes the opportunity to take advantage of Murphy's situation for his own gain.

This update is still set in futuristic Detroit, albeit with a noticeable absence of crumbling decay - replaced instead by a shiny, generic vista of skyscrapers. Zetumer still deals with corruption and monolith corporations but in a very straightforward manner, hammering home a discourse in the debate over man vs machine but diligently sitting on the fence when it comes to any real political stance. RoboCop touches upon the use of drones and issues with the advancement of technology but with no real passion or bite.

A few of the action set pieces eschew all reason, choosing cool and slick over considered. A shootout in a warehouse where the criminals turn off the lights to engage in combat against a robot - so that Padilha can show off night vision effects - is nonsensical if you really think about it. Also no respectable scientist would decide to upload vast files of criminal records and CCTV footage to RoboCop’s memory banks minutes before a public appearance, which happens here merely to push the sluggish and incredibly cheesy storyline along. Every step feels controlled and safe, like it was designed by a Hollywood boardroom think tank.

The decision to change the sex of Murphy’s partner Lewis, played by Nancy Allen in the original, strips this version of a tough female character. Michael K. Williams (Omar from The Wire) takes the role of Lewis but he’s sadly nothing more than a plot device. Focus is placed on Murphy’s transformation from man to machine and sentient being with an overwrought narrative playing out between Murphy and his wife and son.

Saying all that, there are some interesting and grotesque visual flourishes, including showing the full extent of Murphy’s injuries with a floating head, lungs and lone hand revealed beneath his robotic plating. Keaton plays the villainous head of OmniCorp with aplomb, manipulating media and broadcast news through his spin doctor Pat Novak (Samuel L. Jackson on fine form here too) - who spews lines such as, “What’s more important than the safety of the American people?” However, a distinct absence of threat and sense of humour plague this popcorn flick making it unengaging, unrewarding and, most importantly, lacking in any real political edge.

Overleaf: watch the trailer for RoboCop

 

 

Every step feels controlled and safe, like it was designed by a Hollywood boardroom think tank.

rating

Editor Rating: 
2
Average: 2 (1 vote)

Share this article

Add comment

The future of Arts Journalism

 

You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!

We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d

And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters