thu 18/07/2024

Mark Dion: Theatre of the Natural World, Whitechapel Gallery review - handsome installations | reviews, news & interviews

Mark Dion: Theatre of the Natural World, Whitechapel Gallery review - handsome installations

Mark Dion: Theatre of the Natural World, Whitechapel Gallery review - handsome installations

The artist as explorer manqué

'The Library for the Birds of London' (detail), 2018Installation view Whitechapel Gallery, London. Photo: Jeff Spicer/PA Wire

On entering the gallery, you are greeted by the cheeping of birds.

A flock of zebra finches flies around a circular cage and comes to rest on the branches of the apple tree “planted” in Mark Dion’s latest installation (main picture), before taking off on another circuit. Despite being confined inside an aviary, they seem happy enough; how, though, does one tell? Most of us living in cities know precious little about birds or any of the other species sharing the planet with us – although, of course, we try to learn something. 

Heaped around the foot of the tree and arranged on branches and log shelves are numerous tomes full of learned observations about birds, in particular, and the natural world, in general. The finches use the books as perches, which reminds me of a remark made by the American painter Barnet Newman: “Art criticism is to artists what ornithology is to the birds.” In other words, totally irrelevant. 

You can enter the cage, which is decked out with pictures of various ornithologists and some of the gear used by the more intrepid ones such as binoculars, a pith helmet, an axe, saws, a camping-gas stove. With clean sawdust on the floor, the installation is like a cosy encampment, a place where Pooh Bear might have felt at home. Mark Dion: Theatre of the Natural World, Whitechapel GalleryA decoy duck serves to remind us of our less benign relationship with wildlife and surrounding the aviary are hides (or blinds) of the type used for hunting as well as observing game. Each is decked out to suggest a different aspect of the sport. The Glutton, 2008 (pictured above) is an unprepossessing shack made of corrugated iron; inside, though, is a dining table laid for the sumptuous feast that will follow the shoot, while a bucket of bones indicates the many banquets previously held here. 

In The Dandy-Rococo Hunting Blind a chandelier hangs above a vintage sofa, Turkey carpet and numerous hunting trophies. Flasks of brandy are further reminders that hunting was once the “sport of kings”. (Pictured below right: Hunting Blind (The Librarian) 2008). Six hunting standards hang nearby on the gallery wall; resembling medieval pennants; heraldic images of dead game recall the historical importance of the chase for Europe’s erstwhile royalty and aristocracy.

Mark Dion: Theatre of the Natural World, Whitechapel GalleryBeneath the banners, a blind made of rough-hewn wood lies on its side, its broken legs jutting out like the limbs of a bloated carcass. The Ruin not only attests to the decline of hunting as a sport, but suggests nostalgia for the days when big game hunting was an acceptable pastime. Dion warns against such sentiments. “Artists must resist nostalgia,” he says. “When we reference the past it is not to evoke the good old days,” yet he seems to mourn the time when the thrilling abundance of wildlife meant one could study, collect and kill things with impunity. 

With its period furniture and collection of curios, The Naturalist’s Study, 2018 resembles the domain of a Victorian naturalist. There’s a coral tree hung with shark’s teeth, a unicorn’s horn (actually a narwhal’s) and various fossils (actually plaster fakes). The message is complicated, though, by Dion’s wallpaper which bears images of extinct species such as the dodo and woolly mammoth, and photographs he took in natural history museums of stuffed polar bears, a reminder that they also face possible extinction. But the pictures lack the chilling dispassion of Hiroshi Sugimoto’s famous photographs of museum dioramas, which record the enormous care taken to mimic various habitats and wildlife which, in reality, we destroy so thoughtlessly. 

A further warning that all is not well on God’s earth comes with images of dead trees drawn in tar and a pigeon skeleton dipped in the same substance; but they fail to compete with the photographs one sees on the news of virgin forest decimated by loggers or dead seabirds coated in oil. If they are an attempt to address the devastating impact of exploitation and pollution, they are far too muted. 

Instead of travelling to foreign lands like a Victorian explorer collecting exotic specimens, Dion was invited in 2002 to trawl through the collection of the Manchester Museum. The Bureau of the Centre for the Study of Surrealism and Its Legacy (pictured below) brings together items dug out from dusty corners and forgotten drawers. Unusual juxtapositions of things like stuffed birds, Egyptian figurines and wax models are intended to trigger a sense of the uncanny associated with surrealism, but the installation is visible only through a glass partition so there is no way of judging its efficacy. This inaccessibility makes it feel like a mausoleum honouring the intrepid collectors who donated their many treasures to our museums. Mark Dion: Theatre of the Natural World, Whitechapel GalleryTate Thames Dig, 1999 has a much clearer focus. Teams of volunteers spent a week digging in the mud exposed at low tide at Millbank and Bankside. Their findings were cleaned, sorted and collated and a splendid display case made to accommodate them. Fragments of porcelain and pottery, glass bottles, clay pipes, chains, rusty nails, cutlery, teeth and bones, shoe leather and, more recently, mobile phones, electric cable and plastics including combs, bottle tops and credit cards are placed in drawers or stashed away in boxes. Beautifully arranged, the stuff we make, use and throw away becomes a time capsule, a poetic record of our presence in this place.

But recent events, such as a president in the White House who seems hell-bent on speeding up the destruction of the planet and the growing realisation that plastic waste is choking the oceans make Mark Dion’s work seem much too softly spoken. The contentious issue of our disregard for or exploitation of other species can’t be glossed over by whimsical evocations of times past, when wildlife was plentiful and the planet was not in dire straits.

Dion seems to mourn the time when the thrilling abundance of wildlife meant one could study, collect and kill things with impunity


Editor Rating: 
Average: 3 (1 vote)

Share this article

Add comment

Subscribe to

Thank you for continuing to read our work on For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a gift subscription?


Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters