tue 21/05/2024

The Review Show, BBC Two | reviews, news & interviews

The Review Show, BBC Two

The Review Show, BBC Two

With luck, the revamp will make the show look further afield

“New programme, new set, new city,” said Kirsty Wark by way of introduction to the BBC’s new flagship culture programme, The Review Show. It replaces Newsnight Review and goes out after the current affairs programme that spawned it, but now in its own discrete slot. The offspring has left London and moved to the BBC’s fabulous waterfront studios in Glasgow, has brightly coloured seats for its guests and even gets to stay up late: The Review Show lasts 45 minutes, as opposed to half an hour when it was part of Newsnight.

It may seem perverse, then, that the opening hour-long special was about an American and had three Americans on the panel (although two are resident in the UK) as they discussed the cultural impact of Barack Obama’s presidency. But timing is everything, and the programme was marking Obama’s first year in office - and we all know how the media loves an anniversary.

With an hour at her disposal, Wark was able to segment the show into several areas under discussion, including whether African-Americans have benefited from a black president, Obama’s iconic status, his media impact and the effect of having a black family in the White House. The panel - academic Sarah Churchwell, New York Times columnist Ross Douthat and writers Bonnie Greer and Hari Kunzru - was perhaps a little too skewed towards liberals and meant they agreed too much or, rather, being mainly Americans, were too polite to disagree.

The filmed segments I found irritatingly short. The best of them was by New York Times columnist Charles M. Blow, contending that black Americans are worse off now than at the election, and a brief interview with Lee Daniels, who has been accused of racism over his film, Precious, in which a black man twice impregnates his daughter. Yet strangely it didn’t ignite the debate. All that Greer could muster was “I was bored by it [Precious]”. I would have liked more comment on Sandra Bullock’s The Blind Side, about a black boy adopted by a white family, which was referenced but not discussed (as I suspect that few of them had seen it). And there wasn’t time to develop Churchwell’s interesting point that America’s problems are really to do with the intersection of race and class, which has parallels with current political debate this side of the Atlantic.

Newsnight Review, along with the inestimable This Week, on BBC One on Thursdays, used to be the viewing highlight of my week, but I must confess I thought the former’s themed nights worked less successfully than those shows where the panel typically discussed a book, a film, a play and a television premiere. Having everyone digest the same things tends to focus the discussion and make for differing views, heated debates and occasions where panellists showed withering contempt for another’s opinion.

I wonder if themed discussions will be more frequent on The Review Show, as a programme broadcast away from the nation’s cultural centre - which London still is, like it or not - throws up more logistical problems than a London-based one did. Most of Newsnight Review’s guests lived or worked in London and the south-east of England and, notwithstanding Scotland’s hugely disproportionate contribution to British politics, academia and the media, TRS has a smaller local pool of contributors to work from. Or maybe there’s a generous travel budget.

But I’m all in favour of the BBC becoming less London-centric - it is a national organisation after all - and if the revamp prompts the show's producers to look further afield for panellists, it will be a good thing. Because if that means I never again have to watch Ekow Eshun interrupting everybody else to say absolutely nothing of consequence, or Johann Hari rubbishing everyone else’s opinion while his own was often not worth hearing, it will mean my licence fee has been well spent.

Despite the longer slot last night, it was the usual rush to cram everything in and Wark was breathless as she brought the discussion to an end - earning a gentle chide from Douthat for a momentary (and rare) lapse in impartiality when she recommended we see Precious, but neglected to do so for The Blind Side.

It was a slightly shaky start, but under producer Liz Gibbons I have no doubt the The Review Show will settle down very soon. I wish it well.

Watch The Review Show on BBC iPlayer.

Explore topics

Share this article

Comments

I remember a while back when the New York Slimes announced, with great fanfare, that it had replaced Bill Kristol. Its only CONSERVATIVE opinion columnist; all round clever-dick; DC contacts up the Wazoo; and respected editor of the Weekly Standard. And the giant chosen to replace Bill was... "Ross Douhat." There was a a collective WTF on all the conservative blogs and talk radio as to: ROSS WHODAT???? NO one had ever heard of him. To steal a famous line: he rose without trace. Two years later and no one has still ever heard of him. Hence he would be the obvious choice by the BBC to represent American conservatism which is on the ascendency bigtime, FYI. None of those Palin loving, Tea Party/Town Hall attending, anti-Obama, anti-Big Government, anti-statist, socialist opposing conservatives for the BBC. Nah... it's Ross Whodat!

Utter, utter waste of licence payers money. Felt like we were intruding at a private party Kirsty Wark was giving to celebrate no longer having to commute to London. And we should pay for this, why?

I am an Oxord graduate, though certainly not a distinguished one. I feel that I am reasonably intelligent and reasonably cultured.I always found Newsnight Review depressing, as I could only rarely understand what was being said. I used to feel sorry for Martha K and other presenters having to pretend to be entertained and amused by the often baffling and witless contributions of the participants. The Review Show is no improvement. It is a pity that someone as good-looking as Sarah Churchwell is a rapid-fire,over-excitable, gesticulating purveyor of ambiguities! What on earth does Bonnie Greer mean by "viral" ? Is she using "virus" as a metaphor of some sort ?

Dear Kirsty, You must have been gobsmacked when the silvery American said, "How can you have a film about Iraq without Alcaida?!" Because as you and I and the then PM of Canada Jean Chretien know, in 2001 there WERE NO ALCAIDA in Iraq. Saddam Hussein made sure of it. We in Canada knew that Bush would have to hit someone after 9/11 - that Cheney et al were lusting after Iraqui oil and that chaos and Alcaida would follow an attack on Iraq, so we stayed out of it. Blair thought he could save the world, sigh. I hope you set the American straight afterward. And thanked him for proving that the arts matter - "The Green Zone" matters - and there is more news on the Review show than on the news shows. Excelsior!

It was refreshing to have a new chairman tonight and the discussion of the Man Booker shortlist was lively and interesting. Kirsty Wark tends to dominate all discussions as does Martha Kierney. This was much more enjoyable and such a change.

Add comment

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters