sun 17/11/2024

Russian Avant-Garde Theatre, Victoria & Albert Museum | reviews, news & interviews

Russian Avant-Garde Theatre, Victoria & Albert Museum

Russian Avant-Garde Theatre, Victoria & Albert Museum

The moment when theatre was transformed by visionary Russian directors

Costume design by Vladimir Tatlin for 'A Life for the Tsar', 1913-1915, All pictures © A. A. Bakhrushin State Central Theatre Museum, Moscow

Installed in the main exhibition space, this could have been a blockbuster show introducing a large audience to an important moment in Russian Theatre; but tucked away in the Department of Theatre and Performance, where spaces are narrow and galleries small, there is little room to show off these superb exhibits to their best advantage. Only the initiated will, I fear, brave these claustrophobic corridors and persevere long enough to appreciate the goodies on offer.

Faced with walls painted bright red, labels hung too low and hard to read, copious detail about each production but little contextualising information, my inclination was to exit immediately. It took steely determination (and the fact that I had to write this review) to make myself stay, which is a great shame, because the period is fascinating and the exhibits second to none.

So here is some background information that might help you enjoy this potentially stunning exhibition. The show begins in 1913 when visionary directors like Vsevolod Meyerhold were attempting to realign theatre so that it would appeal to a broader public. The psychological realism that his teacher, Konstantin Stanislavsky was aiming for when directing Chekhov, for instance, was to be replaced by “bio-mechanics”, a forerunner of the physical theatre currently practiced by companies such as DV8 and Theatre de Complicite, which emphasises collective action rather than individual motivation.

Rather than foregrounding the spoken word, actors were encouraged to practice skills like gymnastics, dance and juggling and explore physical rather than emotional expression. Characters tended to be stereotypes – a policeman, soldier, singer, nurse or bourgeois – and often landed in farcical or surreal situations.

Meyerhold’s aim was to create a synthesis of sound and movement in which sets, costumes and lighting – designed by avant garde artists such as Malevich, Tatlin, Exter, Stepanova (pictured above left, Vavara Stepanova's costume design for Tarelkin's Death, 1922)  and Rodchenko (pictured right, Alexander Rodchenko's costume design for We, 1920) – played as important a role as dialogue. With sets resembling sculptural installations, the productions were often more akin to circus than proscenium arch theatre. For instance, Liubov Popova’s set for The Magnanimous Cuckold, 1922, a farce about a miller who suspects his wife of infidelity, is like a constructivist machine incorporating wheels, conveyor belts and a windmill.

Not only was Meyerhold way ahead of his time, but he completely transformed theatre. Every wannabe trendy using video in their performances should remember that Meierhold introduced film into stage productions nearly 100 years ago! On show is footage from The Five Year Plan in Four Years, 1926-30, celebrating the mechanisation of agriculture.

Even though his later productions incorporated propogandist material, Meyerhold did not escape censure once Stalin came to power. The theatre he opened in Moscow in 1920 was closed in 1938 and the following year he was arrested, tortured and later executed. That was the price one paid for not embracing Socialist Realism, which had been declared the official style.

To see how the painter, Kasimir Malevich responded to Stalin’s edicts visit his retrospective at Tate Modern and witness another brilliant innovator crushed by history. The V&A show opens with his designs for Matyushin’s opera Victory Over the Sun, 1913, (pictured above) famous for being the catalyst that propelled his move into abstraction with the famous Black Square painting. On film, characters such as the Telephone Talker appear encased in geometric costumes exorting “dream crafters” to “hasten to the contemplaville celestoid outthereers” and spouting gobbledygook reminiscent of Kurt Schwitters’ sound poem Ursonate, 1922.

Unfortunately, too few live elements are included to inject vitality into the show. It's quite an achievement to make such a vibrant moment in theatre history so unappetising; it suggests that Russians still feel ambivalent about the extraordinary creativity of this period. Still, it's worth making the effort to see these treasures, especially considering that people lost their lives for producing them.

Comments

Apparently the designs only arrived from Moscow a week before the opening. Even so, there's no excuse for elementary errors like ascribing the 1923 'Princess Turandot' designs to a production of Puccini's opera (which wasn't premiered until 1926, and anyway his version is just called 'Turandot'). Thanks to Meyerhold, Gozzi was big in 1920s Russia: any expert involved would have known that. I quite admired the attempts to describe the plots of the plays in the captions, though that meant a certain quaintness in, say, 'Macbeth is a Scottish general...'

Anyway, as you write, this is a fascinating exhibition, all the more valuable for following on the heels of the stupendous Malevich show. And there will be another complementary show, on the designs for Shostakovich's 1930 ballet The Bolt, in December, as well as recreations of the pre-revolutionary artistic dialogues at Somerset House.

 

Add comment

The future of Arts Journalism

 

You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!

We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d

And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters