fri 15/11/2024

Max Von Sydow: Extremely Quiet and Incredibly Personable | reviews, news & interviews

Max Von Sydow: Extremely Quiet and Incredibly Personable

Max Von Sydow: Extremely Quiet and Incredibly Personable

The Oscar-nominated star on saying nothing in Stephen Daldry's new film

Cinematic colossus has nothing to apologise for

He played chess with Death in Ingmar Bergman’s The Seventh Seal, was crucified as Jesus in George Stevens’s The Greatest Story Ever Told and diced with the devil in William Friedkin’s The Exorcist. There’s something magnicent and elemental about the life and work of Max Von Sydow. Born in 1929, he has looked like a craggy old monument for at least 30 years.

For several decades Von Sydow has been Hollywood’s Nordic figleaf – an emissary from the farthest shores of European arthouse cinema who gives Hollywood integrity and ballast. No one felt that more keenly than Woody Allen, Bergman’s self-confessed acolyte who cast Von Sydow as a gruff tortured painter in Hannah and Her Sisters. There has been the odd moment of mercenary silliness in that long career. He was Ming the Merciless in Flash Gordon and (having played the heroine’s father in The Diary of Anne Frank) accepted the part of a Wehrmacht officer in the footballing flop Escape to Victory. He was even Blofeld in Sean Connery’s regrettable return to the Bond franchise in Never Say Never Again.

A filmography that begins in 1949 has this year yielded only his second Oscar nomination (the first was for Bille August’s Pelle the Conqueror in 1987). This time round he’s up against another cinematic Methuselah in the form of Christopher Plummer, co-star of Beginners. The difference between their performances is that in Stephen Daldry’s Extremely Loud and Incredibly Personal Von Sydow doesn’t utter a word. It’s a fashionable year for silence in the cinema, thanks to The Artist and Hugo.

In this video interview Von Sydow - with a bit of help from his director Daldry and co-stars Tom Hanks and Sandra Bullock - explains what it means to act without lines. Unless you count the lines on that matchless old face.

Loading the player ...

Add comment

The future of Arts Journalism

 

You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!

We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d

And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters