Meg 2: The Trench review - into the jaws of tedium | reviews, news & interviews
Meg 2: The Trench review - into the jaws of tedium
Meg 2: The Trench review - into the jaws of tedium
Turgid pacing mars Jason Statham's return to the deep
Big bitey sharks and prehistoric monsters have tantalised the imaginations of summer moviegoers for decades, from Jules Verne to Jaws. James Cameron’s Avatar 2: The Way of Water and the director’s recent scientific commentary on the OceanGate submersible disaster also serve to underline the public fascination with the dangerous deep.
Alas, Meg 2: The Trench, based, like its predecessor, on Steve Alten’s hit novels about hungry megasharks, bellyflops and bores. Too bad, because leading man Jason Statham can be a most droll and reliable hero even when the movie around him becomes defiantly silly.
After a jaunty prologue set in the Cretaceous era, in which assorted prehistoric creatures become fast food for ferocious predators (including a Megalodon shark), Meg 2: The Trench turns turgid, returning to the futuristic sealab setting of the first movie.
The top scientist (Wu Jin) envisions exploration (exploitation?) of the sea floor, while Statham’s ecowarrior character hunts ocean polluters. Then his teenage stepdaughter (Sophia Cai, pictured above) stows away on a deep sea mission gone wrong, and the explorers must don absurdly clunky looking metal suits to trudge their way to safety. It’s one of the slowest, murkiest escape sequences ever put on film.
Director Ben Wheatley saves some fun for the movie’s last half hour, when agitated megalodons, octopi, and other dino-things pursue our heroes to a fancy South Asian resort delightfully named Fun Island. By the time Statham rigs a few explosive harpoons and goes tearing after the Megs on a Waverunner, moviegoers may be too exhausted to cheer. Even Statham, athletic and poised as he is, seems a bit weary, too.
The future of Arts Journalism
You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!
We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d
And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.
Subscribe to theartsdesk.com
Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.
To take a subscription now simply click here.
And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?
Add comment