fri 27/12/2024

The Hour, Series Finale, BBC Two | reviews, news & interviews

The Hour, Series Finale, BBC Two

The Hour, Series Finale, BBC Two

Incoherent plot, unconvincing characters, implausible dialogue - but still fun

Dominic West, Ben Whishaw and Romola Garai in 'The Hour'

Part of the fun of watching The Hour, in the absence of a coherent plot, convincing characters and plausible period dialogue, was ruminating on the myriad different ways it could be sliced: a grown-up Press Gang meets Mad Men? The Spy Who Came in From the Cold versus Spooks? All the President’s Men crossbred with Foyle’s War?

What a confused and cross-eyed load of old nonsense it was, but oddly enjoyable nonsense for all that. What it did well it did very well: the drab, shabby, hospital pallor of Fifties London was convincingly evoked. The casting was excellent and the attention to detail forensic: pep pills on the desks; working telex machines; all the crimplene you could eat. But my, how it longed to be Important Television – and whatever else it was, it wasn’t quite that.

For six weeks we’ve followed the fortunes of Bel Rowley (Romola Garai) and Freddie Lyon (Ben Whishaw) (both pictured below), two idealistic young friends in 1956 London promoted from working on dull newsreels to the BBC’s new cutting-edge current affairs programme "The Hour". In an early blow for feminism, Bel was made producer while Freddie joined as home affairs reporter. Hector Madden (Dominic West) was parachuted in as the smooth upper-class anchor.

Against the backdrop of the news team reporting on the escalating Suez crisis various subplots uncoiled: Freddie, dragged into a shadowy nexus of MI6-sanctioned murder, surveillance and a plot to assassinate Nasser, eventually learned he had been earmarked as a "Brightstone", a potential KGB recruit. Bel and unhappily married Hector embarked on a doomed affair while Freddie watched, his poetic little soul full of unrequited longing for one and simmering class resentment for the other. In time the news team forged the unlikely bond of liberal firebrands tilting at the establishment.

the-hourcompThe aim was to cast a roving eye over the broad sweep of the times, from Soviet spy rings to shifting social and sexual mores; from Suez to, God help us, the birth of British satire. In doing so, The Hour bit off considerably more than it could chew. It wasn’t helped by a script which was almost entirely reliant on clichés, clunky exposition and tired archetypes: the chirpy cockney secretary; the spy lurking by a lamp post beneath a curlicue of smoke. Hindsight, meanwhile, made everyone a soothsayer: “There’s a young politician in America called Kennedy - we should watch him,” insisted Freddie in episode one. There was a lot of that kind of thing.

Having meandered, dilly-dallied and frequently drifted off course en route to last night’s final episode, The Hour didn’t quite know what to do when it got there. The denouement was largely lacking in fireworks or twists. BBC boss Clarence (a fine turn by Anton Lesser) was unmasked as the Soviet agent lurking in the nest, a shock of Pope/Catholic, bears/woods magnitude. Having put together The Hour (and its team) with the intention of making it his personal plaything for spreading dissent against the government, his plot worked so well that the final episode lasted 36 minutes before being ignominiously dragged off air.

That the programme would go down in a valiant burst of self-righteous flames was a given. Freddie wheeled in a titled whistle-blower and got his moment in Hector’s chair (but not – at least not yet – in Bel’s bed). By the time he delivered his straight-to-camera eulogy on democratic values we were floating high above Lime Grove and heading directly for cloud cuckoo land.

'Hinting at historical parallels is one thing; sacrificing any semblance of plausibility for smug polemic quite another'

This graceless grafting of the liberal values of 2011 onto 1956 encapsulated the problem with The Hour. Nobody and nothing in it really seemed to belong there. Last night’s brazen appropriation of public dissent over the invasion of Egypt and a satirical sketch about an “illegal war” was such a blatantly self-congratulatory critique of Britain’s involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan that it all but obliterated dramatic truth. Hinting at historical parallels is one thing; sacrificing any semblance of plausibility for smug polemic quite another.

In the end, The Hour was just about worth sticking with because its principal players worked hard to give their characters a three-dimensional quality the writing barely merited. Garai, a picture in a pencil skirt, gamely threw feistiness, vulnerability, sensuality, toughness, guile and the entire Belfast sink at Bel – but still this underwritten, oddly unformed character failed to develop between episodes one and six.

367449-the-hourWest fared better, imbuing an essentially unsympathetic cove with enough humanity, desperation and yearning to make clear that privileged, handsome Hector was as much a victim of the times as everyone else. Beneath Freddie’s relentless, chippy idealism and brittle boyishness Whishaw, too, worked hard to find heart and humour.

Julian Rhind-Tutt clearly relished playing clammy government official Angus McCain as a moustache-twirling pantomime villain, while Anna Chancellor (pictured right) quietly stole the show as Lix, a premonition of what Bel might become should she choose a career over a family. A brisk, bright, whisky-fuelled workaholic who slept in the office, Lix was perpetually puffing on a gasper and wasn’t averse to a quick after-hours tumble with young Freddie when the loneliness closed in.

There is, apparently, going to be another series of The Hour. On balance I’m glad, because I’d like to spend more time with these characters. The task in hand next time will be to find something really worthwhile for them to say and do.

The aim was to cast a roving eye over the broad sweep of the times, from Soviet spy rings to shifting social and sexual mores; from Suez to, God help us, the birth of British satire

Share this article

Comments

Mr. Thomson, Are you serious? Really? Some movie/music/art critics are really good at writing tripe for a living. However, I think you win the prize. For your next review may I suggest you sit at your artsy desk in your room with a view on "Cloud Cuckoo" land. Something tells me, you will feel right at home. Forget about "The Hour" you take yourself way too serious. Mr. Thomson, you should stick (like glue) to writing for Rolling Stone Magazine. You might have a better chance fooling readers at RS that you're a real journalist. Sincerely, film whore btw I choose the name film whore just for you...

^^ oh dear,film whore,it's not that bad is it?! I agree with Mr Thomson(without a p,as in Venezuela-acknowledgements to The Thompson Twins,in Tintin) about the soggy ending to The Hour's finale.Lost In Translation,I would call it! However I too,would like to see a second series of The Hour-it intrigued me with its atmospheric 50s sets and stylish and well-timed continuity.The plot was there,it just needed a bit of tweaking,and as for Romola Garai...well,she interpreted well that 50s mystery and initial sexual repression. More,please! I'm well intrigued.

A flawed but oddly compelling series. And a really good review, which pinpointed many of the reasons I liked it but also why it frustrated me. Could yet be great, The Hour, and I look forward to series 2...

Add comment

The future of Arts Journalism

 

You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!

We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d

And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters