sun 22/12/2024

She Wolves: England's Early Queens, BBC Four | reviews, news & interviews

She Wolves: England's Early Queens, BBC Four

She Wolves: England's Early Queens, BBC Four

Measured account of how the first two female claims on England's throne were thwarted

Presenter Dr Helen Castor: refreshingly unfussy and old fashioned

“Throughout our history, women and power have made an uneasy combination." Dr Helen Castor made it clear the path to power depended on more than the right alliances, lineage, and marriage partner. Even if all those were spot on, being female was enough to halt any rise. The series began with the medieval Queens Matilda and her daughter-in-law Eleanor of Aquitaine. Both wanted to rule, not reign like Queen Elizabeth II.

She Wolves brought Castor’s book She-Wolves: The Women Who Ruled England Before Elizabeth to television. The programme’s sensational title was a given. With an audience beyond the niches of either a history readership or gender studies, the book is a natural for television with clearly told, linear stories that resonate despite dating back at least 600 years. But with only one contemporary image apiece for Matilda and Eleanor, visual material was lacking.

Fortunately, the gap wasn’t filled by clichéd set-ups of Dr Castor poring over medieval manuscripts. Equally thankfully, purposeful striding was at a minimum – although close-ups of pounding horse’s hooves to suggest urgency were overused. Snatches from historic documents were read out by other voices but there were no talking heads, another plus. In a refreshingly unfussy, old-fashioned touch, Dr Castor directly addressed the camera or provided the voiceover.

With Henry II absent much of the time crusading, Eleanor ended up de facto ruler of England

That she carried the programme was both a boon and a drawback. “How far we’ve come, how little we’ve changed,” she said. Matilda had “lost the battle, but won the war”. Formulaic phrases rang out louder than they should have when ranged against her otherwise authoritative delivery, which had no place for loose generalisations. Unlike other history programmes, She Wolves made it clear that contemporary and subsequent records of events were intrinsically flawed due to who wrote them, even though those shortcomings were clunkily ascribed to medieval “spin doctors”.

The generally measured approach extended to eschewing the ghastly analogies that can clog history docs: neither Matilda and Eleanor were the Madonna of the Middle Ages or the Margaret Thatcher of their era. The only broad comparison was with Queen Elizabeth II, for contrast.

Queen MatildaIn the early middle ages, there was no such thing as a queen in the modern sense – a female king. The queen was the king’s wife. Matilda and Eleanor had designs on being more than that. Each was thwarted, but they came damn close. Matilda was the first woman to claim the English throne (pictured right in the centre). Her coronation banquet was prepared in 1141, but she was driven out of London by crowds opposing her. As the daughter of Henry I and granddaughter of William the Conqueror, the chance to rule came after her brother William drowned. His ship had barely left a French port. The entire crew were drunk. She’d been married off at age eight to Henry V, King of Germany and the Holy Roman Empire. He died, she returned to England at 23 and was next married off to Geoffrey of Anjou. On the death of King Henry I, her cousin Stephen claimed the crown of England, despite her father having made the court, gentry and church swear allegiance to her. She was never going to have an easy ride, and those supposedly loyal to her constantly shifted allegiances. However, when Stephen died in 1154, she got her son Henry – Henry II – onto the throne. He declared himself “son of the Empress”.

The tomb of Eleanor of AquitaineEleanor was Henry II’s wife, but had got there via a tortuous route (pictured left, Eleanor's tomb). Their son was Richard the Lionheart. At 13, she married Louis VII and became Queen of France. The couple went off to the crusades together – she was the first female crusader – but she decided to extend a stop-off in Antioch to spend time in the company of her uncle, Prince Raimond. The union with Louis was all but over. Interpreting the law to her advantage, she had the marriage annulled and wedded Henry II eight weeks later – pivotal to The Lion in Winter. The concept of courtly love germinated around her. With Henry II absent much of the time crusading, she ended up de facto ruler of England. 

These twisting tales had more colour than could be covered in an hour – Eleanor’s attempts to convert Saladin to Christianity went down in chronicles as an affair between the two. But Dr Castor made the point. Nothing could make Matilda and Eleanor rulers. They got as close as they could. In the end, it was through their sons that they would have a lasting impact.

Despite the differences between the role of today’s Queen and the absolute rule sought by Matilda and Eleanor, it was impossible to not muse on what Prince Charles might think of She Wolves.

Watch Katharine Hepburn as Eleanor of Aquitaine and Peter O'Toole as King Henry II in The Lion in Winter (1968)


Comments

I watched the First Part of She- Wolves England's Early Queens with great interest. It was an eye opener about the story of Matilda and Eleanor of Aquitaine queen to Henry 11. I enjoyed the location sites and thought that Dr Helen Castor was excellent. She presented the programme with enthusiasm and very detailed. I now intend to buy her Book. I must admit she kept me glued to the viewing it was very good with a new insight to female monarchs. Also what an attractive and charming Presenter Dr Helen Castor is.

It was very refreshing to see, at last, some effort to bring less well-known historical events into the public realm; although Henry II and Eleanor are two of the better known medieval monarchs, (mostly due, I suspect, to Henry's fatal squabble with Thomas Beckett), the prequel to Henry's succession and the Matildine civil war belongs to a poorly popularised period. The same is true of the "Wars of the Roses", so I look forward to subsequent episodes with great anticipation.

I have to say I am rather disappointed with this series. It fails to accept the roles of the earlier queens of england and the impact they had on the 'she-wolf' sterotype. Ælfthryth mother of Æthelred II (commonly know as Æthelred 'unread' or the unready) is among the first 'queens' to have been entitled 'she-wolf' by the chroniclers of the time. Another early queen so often forgotten when she should not be is 'Queen' Emma. As the wife of two kings of England, the mother of two kings of England and the Great Aunt of William the Conquorer it is shameful that she is not dipicted in any historical TV adaptations. She played a huge role in the governing of England at a time when the foundations of our country was laid to be built on by the following rulers. It would be nice for the BBC to delve a little further back and truely include ALL the 'she-wolves' of England and not simply leave the public beleiving that before Matilda, queens were simply ignored or incapable, when this is clearly untrue.

Sadly, I found this to be very wanting as a television programme mostly repetitive shots of Helen Castor wandering about and sitting on trains. It was filled with unsustantiated statements and in many places misplaced shots like pictures of York over descriptions of Scarborough. All in all, a boring disappointment. In actual fact, if you stripped off the vision you would have an OK radio programme

Watching Helen Castor alone seems ok by me, that she "does" history, the icing on the cake.

Helen Castor is the sexiest historian I have ever seen or heard, she could teach me medieval history any time at all

Not if i get there first! 

Add comment

The future of Arts Journalism

 

You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!

We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d

And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters