Ottorino Respighi, the forgotten composer | reviews, news & interviews
Ottorino Respighi, the forgotten composer
Ottorino Respighi, the forgotten composer
Why the Italian composer's reputation needs rescuing
Composed over the course of 12 tumultuous years – from Italy’s disastrous participation in the First World War (1915-6) to the consolidation of Mussolini’s regime (1928) - the Roman Trilogy shows the steady evolution of an eclectic and in some respects pioneering musical talent. But largely on account of being pleasing to follow, especially in their dutiful evocation of picturesque views and scenes (Roman maritime pines, pictured below), they have condemned Respighi to the “middlebrow Easy Listening” category in the minds of many influential critics and punters alike.
Respighi, who died in 1936 well before the introduction of the hateful leggi razziali (anti-semitic racial laws) of 1938, and the declaration of war on the Allies in 1939, has also suffered from an unfair – and totally undocumented – suspicion: that he was too chummy, and too accommodating, with the Fascist regime.
While Mussolini and his cultural advisors did everything they could to “get him on board”, Italy’s most distinguished living composer kept a very careful distance from the regime. The third part of the Roman Trilogy – Feste – is especially singled out by some critics for having pandered to Il Duce’s ridiculous notion of the spiritual link between Fascism and Ancient Rome. The alleged evidence was contined in some of the more bombastic passages, but these were almost certainly done tongue-in-cheek, in the same way that Shostakovich did in order to get some of his compositions past the Soviet cultural commissars.
Fortunately, Nupen’s documentary runs in complete contrast to the conventional view of Respighi, whose output was not only eclectic, but also prolific: nine operas and five ballet suites, 10 concerti for violin or piano, 20 odd chamber compositions of note, not to mention dozens of choral works. While eschewing the more radical technical innovations typical of those pre-war composers such as Stravinsky and Schoenberg whose reputations have so overshadowed his own, we can now see much more in common with some of the most compelling composers of the post-war era, from Messaien to Britten to Arvo Pärt, who like Respighi dedicated much time and effort to researching, reinventing and/or rearranging the music of a much earlier era.
Long before the Renaissance and Baroque eras became fashionable as they are today, Respighi was busy digging out the lost – or ignored - manuscripts of Monteverdi, Vivaldi and Benedetto Marcello, and reappraising them for what they were worth. Nupen's film does much the same for Respighi himself.
Ottorino Respighi: A Dream of Italy is on BBC Four this evening at 7.30 and then on BBC iPlayer.
Add comment
The future of Arts Journalism
You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!
We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d
And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.
Subscribe to theartsdesk.com
Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.
To take a subscription now simply click here.
And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?
more Classical music











Comments
...
And the Nupen film has
Shostakovich was not only a
Shostakovich didn't actually
Shostakovich didn't actually join the communist party until 1960, I think - without double-checking - I'm right in saying, and felt suicidal about having done it (the Eighth Quartet was his own requiem, or so he claimed at one point). Prokofiev was far from apolitical and wanted to serve the cause of music for all - it's a gross oversimplification to say that he returned to the Soviet Union full-time in 1936 because 'he wasn't much liked in America'. He thought he could continue the lifestyle of six months' touring in the west - where he was still very much in demand as pianist and conductor of his own works - and the rest composing in Russia, where he was given the time and money he'd never had for that in America and France.
But this is a complex issue and not discussable in the comments. What I will say is three cheers for Respighi's fecundity, which shows as richer over time.