wed 24/07/2024

Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra, Rattle, Royal Albert Hall | reviews, news & interviews

Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra, Rattle, Royal Albert Hall

Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra, Rattle, Royal Albert Hall

Berlin style in spadeloads, but Rattle's fuss sometimes defuses the electric charge

Sir Simon Rattle, drawing great sounds a little too fussily from his Berlin bandChris Christodoulou

Call me a paradoxically wary old Mahler nut, but I reckon that given 24 months of anniversary overkill, it might keep things fresh to catch each of the symphonies live no more than once a year. So, having heard an Everest of a First Symphony from Abbado in Lucerne last August, I thought Rattle's might be the team likeliest to do this far-from-beginner's symphony similar justice.

Did its Proms Mahler One compare well with the Swiss festival love-in? In terms of orchestral sophistication and dynamic range, certainly. As for cumulative impact, ease of phrasing and the ultimate electric charge, not for me.

There was no doubt about it: we were in the presence of one of the world's great orchestras, and the sound it now makes in Beethoven is nothing like the larded beauty of the Karajan era. Rattle, with his experience of period-instrument lightness and definition, made that instantly clear with the Fourth Symphony which complemented the Mahler in the first half. Its misty slow introduction is an autumnal, minor-key foreshadowing of the cosmic spring awakening that the young Mahler stretches out to even greater lengths in his first major symphonic statement. But in this Beethoven Four there was no schizophrenic leaping between early Romantic seriousness and Haydnesque frolics.

Instead, it was all of a piece, with the most uniformly beautiful woodwind section I've ever heard providing the silver thread through the labyrinth. From singing bassoon up to soaring flute - and forgive me for not crediting the principals, as two share equal duties, though I did recognise my favourite orchestral oboist, Albrecht Mayer - they convinced me for the first time that Beethoven might have had as much genius for wind writing as Mozart. And the finale was as nimble in its articulation as the best chamber orchestras I'd usually prefer to hear in this music.

Even so, there were warning signs in the Adagio of over-interpretation to come. Indeed, Sir Simon, we know you can get extreme pianissimos from your Berlin Philharmonic players, but we don't quite need to have the art underlined. The problems came for me in the Mahler when out of the morning mists of the first movement springs the wayfarer's song about a joyous tramp through matutinal fields. Striking, perhaps, to hear it at first still wrapped in sleep, but if a singer treated the ensuing lines like this, we'd call it mannered. At times like this, the BPO/ Rattle partnership is the Renée Fleming or Elisabeth Schwarzkopf of orchestral teams: lovely sounds, shame about the artifice.

But you could never call this interpretation at any point lacking in insight or illuminating details. The magic reached its height in the time-suspended development, the masterly Berlin horn chorus stealing in with a second, even more enchanting song and the birdsong waxing psychedelic. Rattle placed the climax perfectly, assisted to the hilt by a true artist of the perfect cymbal clash among the percussion.

The trio of the rustic scherzo lilted in true upper-Austrian style; the other-worldly song at the heart of the following funeral cortege hovered on the brink of the phenomenal world. But neither of these inner movements seemed ready enough to get its hands dirty. These were still the Berlin strings digging ever so elegantly into the round-dance, a sophisticated double-bass soloist rather than an out-of-tune dirgemonger launching a minor-key version of the round known to us as "'Frère Jacques". You really need to feel how truly bizarre this intrusion of the mundane would have felt to audiences in the late 19th century. But it was only when E flat clarinet and flute added their inhuman voices to the refrain and the kletzmer-band effect briefly took wing that we felt anything like the shock of the new.

Come the finale, and I knew I was going to be making unfair comparisons with one of the most shattering stretches of concert-hall time I've ever experienced, the charge that Abbado wrought in Lucerne from the first searing "cry of a deeply wounded heart" to the hard-to-pull-off ultimate "triumphal". I was hoping, at least, that the Berliners could rekindle the final, dizzying euphoria  of their Brahms First for Barenboim in Oxford's Sheldonian Theatre on May day - a weak-at-the-knees conclusion to an otherwise rather straightforward interpretation. It didn't quite happen here. The big Tchaikovsky tune that unfolds in the wake of the march mania needs a naturalness of songful phrasing that Rattle seems to me to miss, dissipating the drama, and even the last post didn't quite do it for me, though it made a clarion sound.

Articulate, as before, it certainly was, at least, and a spellbound audience kept quiet in the final haul to paradise regained. An instantaneous standing ovation from many; a lesson in orchestral brilliance, no doubt, to the many budding and recently established young conductors scattered around the Albert Hall. And the incredibly youthful Arena queue, which I was told (wrongly, as it now turns out) got cut off at 11.30 in the morning, showed no signs of being digested just before the concert, proving the Berlin/ Rattle selling power across the board. A good reason, I'd have thought, for the Proms to start thinking about setting up big screens for the disappointed outside the Albert Hall. This one could probably have filled the South Ken amphitheatre four times over.


I was there and am a professional musician. For me (and about 5,998 others) it was ethereal and beautiful, from start to finish. Many members of the audience were in tears, for all the right reasons.Yes, Rattle has the power (and the single-minded insistence) to make an orchestra play to extremes (I have been on the receiving end of it!) but should this be presented in a crit as a negative thing? Most of us feel we have learnt something new when we have worked with him or listened to his interpretations. This not-so-nice veiled criticism of wonderful playing is indeed a sad indictment of our cynical approach to almost everything these days. I was staggered by their playing - ALL of them! I think the deafening roar from the capacity audience at the end of the Mahler spoke far more loudly than your crit. What a terrible shame.... *shakes head* ps. Do you honestly think any modern-day audience would have preferred BPO's principal bassist play that hideously difficult solo as ''an out-of-tune dirgemonger''? Regardless of the marking in the score, I think most audiences would find it difficult to swallow; possibly career-breaking stuff these days...

We must simply beg to differ. I think your estimate of 5,998 is out by at least a dozen ( no doubt more; those are the ones I spoke to, who registered doubt to varying degrees mixed in with the admiration. I doubt if you got round to interviewing the rest). Beautiful playing, yes, and there is nothing veiled in my appreciation of that at all. Surely we can debate the interpretation? And I only say I wish I could hear the funeral march as purposefully out-of-tune because I've witnessed how powerfully it can work when done that way. But probably you're right: it would take courage and may well be 'career-breaking stuff' these days. But let's have at least a bit of dirt there. Says I.

David. If you deign it to be appropriate to be pedantic about the number of people ('5998'), I feel it appropriate to point out that I arrived at 3.30pm, queued in the arena queue, and got in. Shocking journalism.

Touche David ;-) Will work on the other 1000 or so I didn't speak to LOL! I felt it was slightly grimy in places... You're certainly right about the Beethoven - was played like chamber music. Apparently BPO spend a huge amount of their time playing chamber and I think that showed through really well in the Beethoven. Ta for replying.

No, Tom, bad BBC propaganda (where else does a critic check facts?) Helpful of you, though, to set the record straight, so I've tweaked the text accordingly. I'd still like to know the fate of the two blocks' worth of queue still moving slowly at 7.25pm... And I was only batting back that figure. Just for the record, I really don't think I'm cynical, just a bit spoiled. I don't doubt the impact such spectacular playing would have had on any lucky young Mahlerite hearing the work for the first time.

Add comment

Subscribe to

Thank you for continuing to read our work on For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a gift subscription?


Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters